|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 7, 2017 11:41:44 GMT -5
So now we know some of what Flynn is telling Mueller: "As President Trump delivered his inaugural address on the steps of the U.S. Capitol in January , his new national security adviser, Michael Flynn, sent a text to a former business associate telling him that a plan to build nuclear power plants in the Middle East in partnership with Russian interests was 'good to go,' according to a witness who spoke with congressional investigators. Flynn had assured his former associate that U.S. sanctions against Russia would immediately be 'ripped up' by the Trump administration, a move that would help facilitate the deal, the associate told the witness." Yep, there was Flynn sitting at the Inauguration and while Trump was giving his speech Flynn was texting Alex Copson, managing director of ACU Strategic Partners, where Flynn had been working, to deliver the good news. And Copson turned to his seat-mate to brag about it: “Mike has been putting everything in place for us, This is going to make a lot of very wealthy people.” There's the essence of Trump-Russia in a nutshell. How do we know this is what Flynn was telling Mueller? Because in releasing this information Rep. Elijah Cummings reported that: "Mueller’s office was aware of the witness’s account and asked Cummings not to release the information until the special counsel had taken 'certain investigative steps,' which are now complete." Yep, he's talking, and it's not looking good for the Trumpists. No wonder that these things also are happening: " Donald Trump Jr. refused on Wednesday to provide a congressional committee details of a July telephone conversation with his father about a meeting last year at which Trump campaign officials had expected to receive damaging information from the Russian government about Hillary Clinton. Testifying in a closed session before the House Intelligence Committee, Mr. Trump claimed that his conversation over the summer with his father, two days after The New York Times disclosed the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower in Manhattan, was protected under attorney-client privilege because lawyers for both men were on the call." "Republican activists and lawmakers are engaged in a multi-front attack on special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of possible connections between associates of President Trump and Russian agents, trying to stop or curtail the investigation as it moves further into Trump’s inner circle." Of course they are! The GOP is willing to accept collusion with a hostile foreign power, obstruction of justice, pedophilia, anything at all to hold it's rickety coalition of billionaires and bigots together long enough to cut taxes on the rich and eviscerate Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and assistance to the poor. There just is no moral center left to that party.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Dec 11, 2017 20:12:29 GMT -5
As if it were not enough that one of the leading agents conducting the HRC & Trump Russia investigations held a deep hatred for The Donald so as to taint the entire process... Now - get ready for this - his freaking wife worked for the firm that created the fake dossier that started the entire Trump/Russia investigation! www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/11/wife-demoted-doj-official-worked-for-firm-behind-anti-trump-dossier.htmlLook for the lawyers to be reconsidering any plea deals and/or cooperation with the DOJ and perhaps even seeking higher court opinions on any deals made. At this point, there is a good chance this entire investigation is so corrupt that some on the Mueller Team might be looking for lawyers to protect themselves. To the leftists who look at this "investigation" as their last remaining hope to overturn an election, this is now over. I would question why the DOJ's Ohr was not conflicted under the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct. I would be surprised if any charges held and liberals better hope there are no paw prints on here from the radical operatives of the BHO Regime. . >O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 12, 2017 10:05:06 GMT -5
As if it were not enough that one of the leading agents conducting the HRC & Trump Russia investigations held a deep hatred for The Donald so as to taint the entire process... Oh, stop it, already! Repeating Trump talking points is not showing any intelligence.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Dec 16, 2017 19:55:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 17, 2017 11:20:44 GMT -5
Another day and more disgusting corruption uncovered in the Mueller "Russia Investigation". I mean it: you have become a Trump propagandist now. Stop telling us you're not a Trumpist because clearly you've gone over to the Dark Side. I assume you were defending Nixon in the 1970s, too.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Dec 17, 2017 18:48:09 GMT -5
Impossible. I can never be a Trumpster.
If any politician is fine with the size & scope of the federal government (Trump essentially is) then I can never fully be on their side.
If you recall, I said this about Cruz & Paul as well... I do not want to hear about streamlining federal programs - I want to hear about their elimination.
Like Rick Perry - who fumbled on number three - when I could have listed 25 off the top of my head.
That being said, your President has made incredible & amazing progress for our nation on the environment, endangered species & global warming.
Can you think of any politician who has done more to advance the environmental concerns of moderate mainstream working Americans in such a short time?
>O
|
|
|
Post by goldenbucky on Dec 17, 2017 21:56:59 GMT -5
Impossible. I can never be a Trumpster. A Trumpster is as a Trumpster does. Defending Trump against the rule of law makes one a Trumpster in my book. There is no higher principle in Trumpland than to support Trump against anything, regardless of guilt. For somebody who appeals so fondly to constitutional principals, I'm a little surprised to see you make the argument you did. I keep up with a number of constitutional conservatives' takes on the Russia investigation and they continue to speak very highly of Robert Mueller and are devastating in their critiques of Trump. That being said, your President has made incredible & amazing progress for our nation on the environment, endangered species & global warming. Can you think of any politician who has done more to advance the environmental concerns of moderate mainstream working Americans in such a short time? He is desperately making temporary gestures that will be easily reversed by a predecessor in order to keep his supporters on the line. Don't swallow the hook dude. Democrats are so far down the line of succession, and Trump so unpopular, that I think your conservative principles will ultimately fare better without him.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 18, 2017 12:41:44 GMT -5
What gb said. If you defend Trump, you're a Trumpster. Sorry, but when you lie down with pigs you soon smell like them, and you've been wallowing all year.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Dec 18, 2017 17:09:05 GMT -5
What gb said. If you defend Trump, you're a Trumpster. Sorry, but when you like down with pigs you soon smell like them, and you've been wallowing all year. Like down with pigs Professor? Does that mean you're like down with that? You and GB are both being silly about my Trumpster status and are such Trump haters that any rational reply seems fruitless. I will try... I support only a fraction of President Trump's agenda and often find his manner of leadership & brashness less than effective. On the other hand, I see no evidence of collusion in the now seemingly endless Russia Probe. What I see clear & convincing evidence of is that the Mueller team is filled with biased leftists who hate the man and seem willing to ignore common evidentiary legal procedures. To GB's second point about the environment & global warming. I absolutely enjoy the President doing things every other minute just to upset liberals. What the heck do you think BHO did for 8 years? Does bitter people clinging to their bibles & guns ring a bell with you guys? Karma? >O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 18, 2017 22:17:24 GMT -5
On the other hand, I see no evidence of collusion in the now seemingly endless Russia Probe. I'm so sorry! I had no idea you were blind.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Dec 18, 2017 23:44:59 GMT -5
Very funny professor. Your post reminded me of a poster in Batavia High School back in the 1980s... It was Stevie Wonder saying he would rather drive himself than ride with a drunk. I remember thinking that it would be pretty cool to ride with Stevie, but I would still rather have the drunk drive the dang car! >O
|
|
|
Post by goldenbucky on Dec 19, 2017 8:47:58 GMT -5
On the other hand, I see no evidence of collusion in the now seemingly endless Russia Probe. What I see clear & convincing evidence of is that the Mueller team is filled with biased leftists who hate the man and seem willing to ignore common evidentiary legal procedures. Not sure you can have this both ways at this moment - the independent counsel is collecting evidence and, while working quickly, is not done. There sure as sh!t is an awful lot of smoke (noting all of that would be a pretty long post) for there not to be a fire. If you are referring to evidence in court then it is clearly too early to know. So far we have a guilty plea from a campaign associate and an indicted campaign manager. Independent counsel is still working. We shall see... With regard to ignoring evidentiary procedures, perhaps you should apply the just a fraction your legal standards to the claims of Trump's lawyers. The counsel is a Republican decorated Marine former FBI Director who enjoyed wide bipartisan support when he was appointed. He is as good as it gets. Nobody of note (or in this forum) had an issue with him until he started finding things.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 19, 2017 9:23:46 GMT -5
The counsel is a Republican decorated Marine former FBI Director who enjoyed wide bipartisan support when he was appointed. He is as good as it gets. Nobody of note (or in this forum) had an issue with him until he started finding things. It was hilarious seeing Newt Gingrich on Fox attacking Mueller, when he called him the "best man" for the job just a few months ago. The closer this gets to Trump's inner circle, the more vociferous the attacks, including Fox's daylong claims of a "coup" by Mueller over the weekend.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 19, 2017 9:38:30 GMT -5
"The Senate Intelligence Committee is looking at the presidential campaign of the Green Party’s Jill Stein for potential “collusion with the Russians.” linkI wonder when they're going to look at whether the Russians helped Sanders, too? My suspicion long has been that the Russians did anything and everything they could to prevent Hillary from winning. We know from Russian documents that Putin sees her as "irredeemable" in her opposition to his aims for re-establishing, or even expanding, Russia's sphere of influence in Europe. And we know that the Russians actively helped the Trump campaign. I have little doubt part of that was getting Sanders voters to pick Stein in the general election (she got enough votes in Wisconsin to throw the state to Trump, quadruple the number she got in 2012). Putin's hands are all over the election, whatever Trump says. Note the three people at the center of this photo:
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 19, 2017 11:11:45 GMT -5
In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter...Trump was "briefed and warned" at the session about potential espionage threats from Russia, two former law enforcement officials familiar with the sessions told NBC News. A source close to the White House said their position is that Trump was unaware of the contacts between his campaign and Russians. The situation was complicated by the fact that the FBI had already become aware of contacts between members of the Trump campaign and Russia, and was beginning to investigate further. Former CIA Director John Brennan has said he told the FBI about a pattern of contacts the CIA observed between members of the Trump team and Russians, and former FBI Director James Comey said the bureau then began investigating in July 2016...By the time of the warning in late July or August, at least seven Trump campaign officials had been in contact with Russians or people linked to Russia, according to public reports. There is no public evidence that the campaign reported any of that to the FBI. www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-warned-trump-2016-russians-would-try-infiltrate-his-campaign-n830596No comment.
|
|
|
Post by jon on Dec 20, 2017 12:32:13 GMT -5
Well, letś review. What we do know: 1. After well over a year and many millions of dollars invested in finding some shred of evidence that Trump or anyone central to his campaign or transition team had any inappropriate contact (or collusion, whatever that is) with Russia there is absolutely no evidence at all. Given more years and more millions, perhaps the corrupt Mueller can entrap a couple more people on irrelevant charges. 2. Hillary's campaign and the DNC did fund the phony ¨Russian Dossier¨ and there is every reason to believe that the corrupt Obama FBI, with collusion from other Obama agencies and John McCain, knowingly took false evidence to the FISA court to spy on American citizens.
What is not yet certain but very strongly supported by a huge pile of evidence: Political (dem) corruption in the FBI and several intelligence under Obama has been pervasive and likely the worst America has ever had. But the phony Russia, Russia, Russia lies do distract from the obvious FBI protection of Hillary & her crew in the vast illegal email scandal. And uranium one, which, if truly examined very likely leads to criminality by numerous FBI leaders, when Mueller was in charge, plus Holder & Obama. And that does not begin to touch the scandal of unmasking by Rice, Powers, et al.
It remains a possibility that Mueller is honest , though if so he suffers massively poor judgement and susceptibility to being very easily mislead. Much more likely, he is devoted to covering up corruption in the FBI for which he and his buddy Comey were responsible. BTW, despite all the media hype about Mueller's infalibility, millions of people were extremely disappointed that Comey by admittedly leaking confidential FBI information (a crime) for political purposes was able to get his friend appointed to do a witch hunt on the guy who fired him. Even if Mueller were the saint his supporters claim (watch that change when he admits he can find nothing on Trump) the gross conflict of interest was apparent from the beginning. If he really were an honorable man, he would have closed down the witch hunt when he was made aware---if he did not know from the start---of the actions by his carefully hand-picked team and their intense conflicts of interest. The only reason so many leftists have to believe in his sainthood is that the media has promoted the legend.
Of course those who rely on the NYT & WP know little if any of the truth. Ignorance is bliss, so it is said, though even so it is not common to see a happy leftist these days.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 20, 2017 18:58:32 GMT -5
Well, letś review. What we do know: 1. After well over a year and many millions of dollars invested in finding some shred of evidence that Trump or anyone central to his campaign or transition team had any inappropriate contact (or collusion, whatever that is) with Russia there is absolutely no evidence at all. Given more years and more millions, perhaps the corrupt Mueller can entrap a couple more people on irrelevant charges. 2. Hillary's campaign and the DNC did fund the phony ¨Russian Dossier¨ and there is every reason to believe that the corrupt Obama FBI, with collusion from other Obama agencies and John McCain, knowingly took false evidence to the FISA court to spy on American citizens. Wrong on every particular, jon. The Mueller investigation started in May, which means it's been going on for barely 7 months, and we know that two principal figures have entered guilty pleas in exchange for cooperating with prosecutors. We have no idea what they're saying or what documents they're turning over. But from the public record we already have a number of cases of possibly illegal contact between the Trump campaign and the Russian intelligence services. Quit lying.What is not yet certain but very strongly supported by a huge pile of evidence: Political (dem) corruption in the FBI and several intelligence under Obama has been pervasive and likely the worst America has ever had. But the phony Russia, Russia, Russia lies do distract from the obvious FBI protection of Hillary & her crew in the vast illegal email scandal. And uranium one, which, if truly examined very likely leads to criminality by numerous FBI leaders, when Mueller was in charge, plus Holder & Obama. And that does not begin to touch the scandal of unmasking by Rice, Powers, et al. Utter nonsense.
It remains a possibility that Mueller is honest , though if so he suffers massively poor judgement and susceptibility to being very easily mislead. Much more likely, he is devoted to covering up corruption in the FBI for which he and his buddy Comey were responsible. BTW, despite all the media hype about Mueller's infalibility, millions of people were extremely disappointed that Comey by admittedly leaking confidential FBI information (a crime) for political purposes was able to get his friend appointed to do a witch hunt on the guy who fired him. Even if Mueller were the saint his supporters claim (watch that change when he admits he can find nothing on Trump) the gross conflict of interest was apparent from the beginning. If he really were an honorable man, he would have closed down the witch hunt when he was made aware---if he did not know from the start---of the actions by his carefully hand-picked team and their intense conflicts of interest. The only reason so many leftists have to believe in his sainthood is that the media has promoted the legend. Tinfoil hat material.Of course those who rely on the NYT & WP know little if any of the truth. Ignorance is bliss, so it is said, though even so it is not common to see a happy leftist these days. Those who rely on Fox and Brietbart actually wind up less informed than people who get no news at all, which is why you keep believing things that are not true.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Dec 28, 2017 22:17:21 GMT -5
How Shocking! Leftists are still entrenched at every branch of government after 8 years of the Obama Regime. Who would believe that? Would a radical Chicago Saul Alinsky-Style Community Organizer really do such a thing! Now the DOJ & FBI just cannot seem to find records relating to the Anti-Trump Dossier that started this entire ridiculous Trump/Russia witch hunt. The anti-Trump bureaucrats just suddenly get reassigned whenever records of the Democrat-financed fake dossier are sought. Awww... So sorry you lost the records... So sorry that public servant moved along... We just should hug, listen to Pete Seeger, and talk about it... www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nunes-blasts-doj-fbi-for-failure-to-produce-records-relating-to-anti-trump-dossier/ar-BBHsJHY?li=BBnb7KzEven mainstream moderate California Congressman Devin Nunes has had enough of the stonewalling. As I said previously - people should be getting fired & going to jail in this probe - and they do not include Donald Trump. >O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 28, 2017 22:54:08 GMT -5
Even mainstream moderate California Congressman Devin Nunes has had enough of the stonewalling. Nunes has been leading the stonewalling, for crying out loud! Will you please quit pretending your not a Trumpist. It's now a running joke about you.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Dec 30, 2017 14:36:44 GMT -5
The WH, backed by some in Congress and the usual panoply of crazies (Fox, Breitbart, etc.) has been trying to discredit the Mueller investigation but their favorite tactic: the Big Lie. "It all stems from a dossier paid for by Hillary," they claim. But they know this is a lie because they know that if this were a game of Clue they'd have the cards in the envelope memorized: Papadopoulos, in the bar, with a big mouth: "During a night of heavy drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia’s top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton. About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign. Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role. The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired." Yes, this guy was bragging to an official of a foreign government that the Russian security agencies had hacked into Hillary's emails. Of course the FBI began to investigate. Here was a member of a US presidential campaign who had inside knowledge about what information Russian spies had concerning the other candidate. How could he have known that, unless there had been contacts between the Trump campaign and the Russians? What other activities were the Russians engaging in to affect our elections? And what did he or other campaign staff know about that? Most important: were members of the Trump campaign actively working with Russian spies to win the election? Of course the FBI opened an investigation; how could it not? Now, some in the GOP are trying to undermine the legitimacy not only of the Mueller investigation, but of the FBI as an institution. Like the Paternoistas in State College, they are going after the hall monitor instead of the perps. And it's creating yet another rift in the Republican Party: "A growing campaign by President Trump’s most ardent supporters to discredit the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and the law enforcement agencies assisting his investigation is opening new fissures in the Republican Party, with some lawmakers questioning the damage being done to federal law enforcement and to a political party that has long championed law and order." It's hard to pose as the defenders of law and order--a GOP theme since the 1960s--when you are attacking law enforcement officers. So there's a lot of pushback to this nutty crusade, but in the end it's just further evidence that the GOP is not a party that is prepared to govern.
|
|
|
Post by goldenbucky on Jan 3, 2018 11:50:00 GMT -5
Apropos of the congressional footdragging noted above, extensive congressional testimony has been given, but not released, by Fusion GPS, the firm commissioned by Republicans and Democrats: "Yes, we hired Mr. Steele, a highly respected Russia expert. But we did so without informing him whom we were working for and gave him no specific marching orders beyond this basic question: Why did Mr. Trump repeatedly seek to do deals in a notoriously corrupt police state that most serious investors shun?What came back shocked us. Mr. Steele’s sources in Russia (who were not paid) reported on an extensive — and now confirmed — effort by the Kremlin to help elect Mr. Trump president. Mr. Steele saw this as a crime in progress and decided he needed to report it to the F.B.I." "We don’t believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.’s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp. The intelligence committees have known for months that credible allegations of collusion between the Trump camp and Russia were pouring in from independent sources during the campaign. Yet lawmakers in the thrall of the president continue to wage a cynical campaign to portray us as the unwitting victims of Kremlin disinformation." " Republicans have refused to release full transcripts of our firm’s testimony, even as they selectively leak details to media outlets on the far right. It’s time to share what our company told investigators."
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Jan 3, 2018 17:27:12 GMT -5
" Republicans have refused to release full transcripts of our firm’s testimony, even as they selectively leak details to media outlets on the far right. It’s time to share what our company told investigators." When the Fox-Hounds report that "nothing has come out" that implicates Trump it will be well to remember this statement from one of the witnesses. When they talk about "stonewalling" remember that it's Nunes and the GOP that's doing the stonewalling. When they try to deflect to Hillary or Comey or Mueller, remember that this is a typical legal tactic in a conspiracy case: "Don't blame you, don't blame me, blame the guy under the apple tree" is the game being played here.
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Jan 3, 2018 17:33:23 GMT -5
Yes! That is it! A vast right wing conspiracy!
Mueller and his merry band of leftists keep your hopes alive just like two children waiting for Santa Claus. All they have alleged are silly process crimes that are a stretch at best.
HRC lost because people hated her as a candidate and middle America despises liberal political ideology. There was no collusion! There is no need for Scooby Doo!
This thread and the entire Trump-Russia investigation is deserving of some appropriate theme music.
>O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Jan 3, 2018 17:50:32 GMT -5
While 'basser digs himself deeper into Denial Cave on this, as on climate change, two news stories reveal what may really have Trump both cowed (by Putin) and scared (of Mueller), leading to his whacko outbursts: "Bannon also identifies money laundering as a key area of vulnerability for the Trump family, which is indeed one of the prime areas of focus for special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation. When they start asking about money, 'They’re going to crack Don Junior like an egg on national TV,' Bannon told Wolff. "Money laundering also comes up in the second fascinating piece out today, an op-ed in the New York Times by Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, the founders of Fusion GPS. Their firm was hired first by a conservative website to do opposition research on Trump, and when he became the Republican nominee, the research was picked up by the Clinton campaign. They’ve already testified before Congress and seem frustrated by the fact that the Republicans who control the congressional investigations don’t want to pursue evidence of money laundering: ' We told Congress that from Manhattan to Sunny Isles Beach, Fla., and from Toronto to Panama, we found widespread evidence that Mr. Trump and his organization had worked with a wide array of dubious Russians in arrangements that often raised questions about money laundering. Likewise, those deals don’t seem to interest Congress.'" Money-laundering is a classic trap used by the FSB (formerly Checka, GPU, OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB, KGB) to ensnare potential sources into their networks, providing both positive (cash) and negative (exposure) incentives to play along. Either Trump & Family are in bed with Putin or they're stupid chumps; the jury's out on this one. Finally, "something else Bannon told Michael Wolff, about the meeting with the Russians: ' The chance that Don Jr. did not walk these jumos up to his father’s office on the twenty-sixth floor is zero.'” In other words, even Bannon doesn't believe the ludicrous claim that these people took a meeting with the whole inner circle of the campaign, but the candidate didn't know anything about it, much less participate in the meeting. If Bannon doesn't believe Trump, why do 'basser, LL, and jon, I wonder?
|
|
|
Post by goldenbucky on Jan 4, 2018 20:26:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by goldenbucky on Jan 8, 2018 10:00:12 GMT -5
Well, here we go, Mueller is seeking to interview Trump. "With the possibility now looming that the president himself could be subject to an interview by the FBI or Mueller’s investigators, Trump’s legal team has been debating whether it would be possible to simply avoid it. One individual familiar with the strategy said those internal discussions within Trump’s legal team began shortly after the president’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was indicted in late October for money laundering in connection with his business dealings with Ukraine." Declarations of being a "stable genius" aside, imagine the panic in the WH at the idea of Trump being interviewed. I mean, the guy basically admitted to obstruction of justice on national TV (with Lester Holt) and routinely spews demonstrable lies. Unless he's totally innocent, it is hard to imagine that he wouldn't further compromise himself and those around him.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Jan 9, 2018 19:07:03 GMT -5
Sen. Chareles Grassley decided to break faith with the rest if the Intelligence Committee he chairs by making a unilateral criminal referred to the Justice Department against Christopher Steele, the British ex-spy who wrote a report for Fusion GPS on Trump's connections to Russia. The CEO of Fusion, Glenn R. Simpson, asked that the Committee release his testimony, delivered earlier in hearings, to clarify for the public what Steele was doing and why. Grassley refused, so today Sen. Dianne Feinstein released the testimony in her capacity of Ranking Minority Member. Here's a summary ,thanks to Jennifer Rubin, and a link to the full document:First, it makes clear that Steele was engaged because of his expertise and contacts. He was not told to find anything in particular, but just to research the totality of Trump’s involvement in Russia. Second, according to Simpson, Trump was doing business all over the former Soviet states of Georgia and Azerbaijan. Interestingly, Trump repeatedly denied having financial ties in Russia itself but never publicly denied operations in states in which Russians exercised substantial influence. Third, in investigating Trump’s finances they found his properties were not as highly valued as he suggested and, in the case of several golf courses, weren’t making money. Fourth, Steele took it upon himself to report his finding to the FBI because he believed there was a “crime in progress” and matter of national security. He later relayed to Simpson that the FBI already had information from a campaign source. Fifth, Trump lied about not knowing who Felix Sater is. Simpson testified, “This was something he didn’t want to talk about and testified under oath he wouldn’t know Felix if he ran into him in the street. That was not true. He knew him well and, in fact, continued to associate with him long after he learned of Felix’s organized crime ties. So, you know, that tells you something about somebody.” We do not know if Sater was in fact tied to organized crime. Sixth, Simpson called it a reasonable “interpretation” that the Trump Tower meeting was designed by Russian officials to reach out to and cooperate with the Trump team. Seventh, far from interfering in the election to benefit Hillary Clinton, the FBI did not publicly disclose during the campaign the wealth of information it was learning about Trump and Russia.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Jan 10, 2018 15:53:00 GMT -5
While Trump fulminates and congressional Republicans dither and hinder, Mueller continues to move forward with his investigation: "Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has added a veteran cyber prosecutor to his team, filling what has long been a gap in expertise and potentially signaling a recent focus on computer crimes. Ryan K. Dickey was assigned to Mueller’s team in early November from the Justice Department’s computer crime and intellectual-property section, said a spokesman for the special counsel’s office...Dickey’s addition is particularly notable because he is the first publicly known member of the team specializing solely in cyber issues...Legal analysts have said that one charge Mueller might pursue would be a conspiracy to violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, if he can demonstrate that members of Trump’s team conspired in Russia’s hacking effort to influence the election." The Republicans trying to wish away this investigation are delusional. Mueller will finish this, and then we'll see what comes out. Expect no final report before the 2018 election.
|
|
|
Post by jon on Jan 10, 2018 19:10:09 GMT -5
Well, we will see. The apparent partisan collusion of FBI with Hillary campaign is becoming more and more obvious. reports now that FBI had ¨informers inside Trump campaign¨ Why? Did they have informants inside the Hillary campaign?
IG report will be very interesting, as will the renewed , and no longer politicized, FBI look at the Clinton ¨foundation¨. Possible, of course, that this might all lead to exoneration of the clintons. I suspect not.
Meantime---exactly what evidence exists of any improper ¨collusion¨ between the Trump campaign and any Russian govt. agencies? There is overwhelming evidence clearly visible that Hillary and her staff committed criminal acts regarding classified government information and the FBI engaged in politically corrupt activities to obstruct justice in that criminality. Not yet sure, but a good chance that this corruption & criminality might be made visible to the American people. Oprah will not be enough to save the criminal Dem party from justice. Mueller & Comey may well go down too---they are corrupt & guilty as Hell. going to be an exciting couple of weeks, eh?
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Jan 11, 2018 0:12:33 GMT -5
Well, we will see. The apparent partisan collusion of FBI with Hillary campaign is becoming more and more obvious. LOL! This is bonkers, of course. The FBI Director helped cost her votes last November by publicly announcing the "re-opening" of her case less than two weeks before the election. That was just a few months after he publicly lambasted her even while conceding there was no criminal case against her. And while he was withholding from the pubic the fact that the FBI was investigating Trump's connections to Russia. Not to mention that the NYC FBI office was leaking inside information to Rudy Giuliani, which we know because he kept previewing what they were going to say. Have you ever met an FBI agent? Here's a surprise: virtually all of them are Republicans, conservative Republicans, at that. Please, quit being a Fox puppet and start using your own brain.
|
|