|
Post by muddydove on Apr 2, 2016 12:48:36 GMT -5
With the DC Madam scandal bomb about to re-drop and the promise within that data being highly relevant to the 2016 race, it's a fair speculation that the Ted Cruz campaign is about to die. There has been no name mentioned just yet, but reading between the lines, it's highly unlikely that it could be anyone else. - timeframe being prior to 2007, Cruz at least spent time in Washington - information known and sealed since 2007 - petitions of release of info started in January, about the time the Cruz campaign began to become relevant. - already tabloid information out there about associations with prostitutes - Anonymous has dirt on him that they are ready to come forward with - the urgency of this release of information coincides with the peaking of Cruz in the campaign Put 2 and 2 together and this guy is history. If you're running as this evangelical candidate that God wants to win, fooling around with hookers and getting caught means game over. I would be shocked if it was anyone else. Who else is even a remote possibility? Certainly not Trump and not likely Kasich or Sanders because they're trailing significantly and pose no threat to be the nominees. Someone bring the popcorn for this show, it will be fun to see that train wreck go down. Cruz visiting the whores .............. laugh of the century! I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 2, 2016 13:28:59 GMT -5
With the DC Madam scandal bomb about to re-drop and the promise within that data being highly relevant to the 2016 race, it's a fair speculation that the Ted Cruz campaign is about to die. There has been no name mentioned just yet, but reading between the lines, it's highly unlikely that it could be anyone else. Cruz visiting the whores .............. laugh of the century! :) I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Links?
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Apr 2, 2016 17:30:07 GMT -5
For those of us who are not part of the evangelical wing, hookers & affairs hold little water...
For example, if Ted went to hookers, his apology to me might simply be "Basser, as penitence, I will work for full repeal of the Endangered Species Act."
And all is forgiven.
Now if Ted buried bodies in his crawlspace and had drums of body parts on the porch, then I would seek something much more significant...
Perhaps "Basser, as penitence, I will appoint Michele Bachmann to wind down the EPA with daily press conferences on the status of its impending demise."
And all is forgiven.
After all, there are certain standards of decorum & decency in politics.
>O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 2, 2016 22:55:23 GMT -5
For those of us who are not part of the evangelical wing, hookers & affairs hold little water...
Yeah, you and I might not care, but an awful lot of those GOP primary voters certainly do. If this story were to break (I'm not expecting it, but hypothetically) it would nearly guarantee Trump the nomination, at which point President Hillary Clinton assuredly will be taking the oath of office next January 20.
Perhaps "Basser, as penitence, I will appoint Michele Bachmann to wind down the EPA with daily press conferences on the status of its impending demise."
Well, other than making a public fool of herself at press conferences, there isn't much Bachmann can do, so that'd be an ideal job for her.
|
|
|
Post by muddydove on Apr 3, 2016 17:28:47 GMT -5
Suggested nickname Cruz should put on Trump:
(Remember that you heard it here first. I emailed this suggestion to the Cruz campaign about 10 minutes ago.) Trump is all big with the nicknames -- Lyin' Ted, Little Marco, Low-Energy Jeb, etc.
Cruz should tag Trump with "Baby Donald." If you've listened to the news today, Trump has said that it's "very unfair" to require him to get to the 1237-delegate threshold in order to be given the nomination.
That's something a baby would say.
If Cruz starts calling him "Baby Donald," I think it would really stick for 2 reasons: 1) he is acting like a baby, and 2) the image of Trump as a baby is so completely opposite to Trump's own image of himself that it would rattle the heck out of him. If Cruz uses it 3 or 4 times, it'll stick like glue to Trump.
|
|
munertl
State Legislator
Posts: 261
|
Post by munertl on Apr 10, 2016 13:23:39 GMT -5
I'm somewhat surprised that Trump hasn't just started calling him Rafael just to make him sound more foreign, Kind of like how most Republicans emphasize Obama's middle name of Hussein.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 10, 2016 14:11:07 GMT -5
I'm somewhat surprised that Trump hasn't just started calling him Rafael just to make him sound more foreign, Kind of like how most Republicans emphasize Obama's middle name of Hussein. Good point. I hadn't thought of that, though Trump's MO is to go after what appears to be an opponent's strong point and turn it into a weakness. So, when Cruz has signs saying TrusTed, Trump responds with Lyin' Ted. Schoolyard-level stuff, but it may be effective, and certainly helped undermine Bush and Rubio.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 27, 2016 12:31:25 GMT -5
"INDIANAPOLIS — Ted Cruz said Wednesday morning that he would make a “major announcement” at an afternoon rally here, a day after his drubbing by Donald Trump in Republican presidential primaries in five East Coast states. Cruz declined to say what his announcement would be." link
There have been reports over the past day or two that he's going to name a VP candidate, as Reagan did in 1976 during his close contest with Gerald Ford. Among names being bandied about: Indiana's Gov. Mike Pence and former Gov. Mitch Daniels, presumably because either would help win Tuesday's primary. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 27, 2016 19:11:44 GMT -5
It's Carly! OK, the reasons for this (almost unprecedented) announcement today are: (1) to change the media story from Trump's sweep in the Acela Primary, and (2) to hope Fiorina can help Cruz carry some CA districts where tech is important, denying delegates to Trump. What the hell, since he was eliminated from actually winning a majority of delegates this week, what's he got to lose?
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 27, 2016 21:43:11 GMT -5
The Clinton campaign's digital communications team responds to the Firorina announcement: "Ted Cruz's game of sandbox presidency is sorta adorable. Tomorrow night will be his first State of the Union. Friday he pardons a turkey." link
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 28, 2016 12:22:20 GMT -5
Former House Speaker John A. Boehner described Senator Ted Cruz as “Lucifer in the flesh” during a forum at Stanford University on Wednesday and said that he would not vote for the Texas Republican if he is the party’s presidential nominee...“I have Democrat friends and Republican friends,” Mr. Boehner told David Kennedy, an emeritus history professor, at the event. “I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life.” linkYeah, but how do you REALLY feel, Mr. Speaker?
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Apr 28, 2016 23:58:30 GMT -5
Oh what a shock!
The Merlot Marxist & Tan Totalitarian J.B. attacking a moderate who has actually read the Constitution!
So sorry that Mr. Boehner cannot read at a first grade level...
If he could, he would realize that a government shutdown of this liberal monstrosity is not a political strategy - IT IS CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED!
Boehner was not elected to get along with radical leftists.
He took an oath to uphold the Constitution and he failed, and failed, and failed...
Boehner is the epitome of everything that is wrong with the GOP.
He is the reason the GOP will nominate yet another leftist in Trump...
And the reason a once proud party will be forever lost.
>O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 29, 2016 6:54:38 GMT -5
Oh what a shock!
The Merlot Marxist & Tan Totalitarian J.B. attacking a moderate who has actually read the Constitution!
So sorry that Mr. Boehner cannot read at a first grade level...
If he could, he would realize that a government shutdown of this liberal monstrosity is not a political strategy - IT IS CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED!
Boehner was not elected to get along with radical leftists.
He took an oath to uphold the Constitution and he failed, and failed, and failed...
Boehner is the epitome of everything that is wrong with the GOP.
He is the reason the GOP will nominate yet another leftist in Trump...
And the reason a once proud party will be forever lost.
>O
Always entertaining, lol. Here's the thing, though: Trump's run to the nomination shows that the "small government" types have lost the big argument, as Heather Wilson confirms: "Limited government types might finally realize that they’re the weirdos, not everyone else. For years, fans of limited government—I include myself here, by the way—have soldiered on, complaining incessantly about the GOP, all while secretly believing that almost everyone else agrees with them, at least deep down, on things like tax cuts and abolishing the Department of Education and occasionally reading F.A. Hayek. Well, if this election doesn’t cure that illusion, nothing will. "The current GOP front-runner is an enthusiastic statist; the Democrat side of the aisle, meanwhile, boasts a hyper-statist front-runner and an unapologetic socialist also-ran who literally spent his honeymoon in the Soviet Union. To put it mildly, limited government, free markets, and individual liberty are clearly not all the rage. Perhaps a Trump vs. Clinton matchup, for all its faults, would inspire some serious introspection as to why—and how to fix the problem. Kidding aside, that would be a real upside to this current mess. Can we count on it? We shall see." linkThe "why" is pretty obvious: People actually expect government to help them, not leave them exposed to the rapaciousness inherent in capitalism without any defense against things beyond their control, such as economic meltdowns, natural catastrophes, or just bad luck. Not everyone wants to be the hero of an Ayn Rand novel.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Apr 29, 2016 13:26:56 GMT -5
"In a setback for Donald Trump, Indiana's governor endorsed the front-runner's chief rival, Ted Cruz, on Friday, just days before the state's critical Republican primary contest. Indiana Gov. Mike Pence made his support for the Texas senator official during an afternoon radio interview, casting Cruz as 'a principled conservative.'" linkI doubt anyone on Capitol Hill would put the words "principled" and "Cruz" in the same sentence. Now "showboat" and "Cruz" (can I hear a Lucifer!) would get a lot of likes.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 1, 2016 13:49:32 GMT -5
Ted Cruz's campaign has made a big deal out of its ability to pick up most delegates at state conventions, even in states where he lost (sometimes badly) to Trump. But the NYT reports today that all is not going as well as claimed in that regard: "But it turns out that delegates — like ordinary voters — are susceptible to shifts in public opinion. And as the gravitational pull of Mr. Trump’s recent primary landslides draws more Republicans toward him, Mr. Cruz’s support among the party’s 2,472 convention delegates is softening, threatening his hopes of preventing Mr. Trump’s nomination by overtaking him in a floor fight...Before Mr. Trump’s crushing victory in Pennsylvania last week, Mr. Cruz’s campaign boasted that it had 69 people devoted to acquiring as many as possible of the state’s 54 unbound delegates — who are free to vote as they please on the first ballot, making them potentially decisive players in a contested convention. Mr. Cruz won only three. "In North Dakota, where the Cruz campaign declared victory after the state Republican convention on April 3 and declared that it had won “a vast majority” of the state’s 28 unbound delegates, Mr. Cruz’s support appears to be weakening. In interviews, delegates said he really had only about a dozen firm commitments to begin with, and some of them appear to be wavering as he falls farther behind Mr. Trump. And in states across the South, which was supposed to be Mr. Cruz’s bulwark, some delegates are now echoing a growing sentiment inside the Republican Party: a sense of resignation to the idea that Mr. Trump will be their standard-bearer." linkWhat we are seeing is normal in US presidential nomination battles: at some point the front-runner usually begins to consolidate support across the party. In fact, it's happening in both parties right now, and while this seems a little late compared to most recent elections, it's actually still early by historical standards. No one in the leadership of either party really wants the kind of brawls that marred the 1964 GOP and 1968 Dem conventions, or even the less-contentious 1976 Ford-Reagan showdown on the floor. Modern conventions are extended infomercials, after all, and the GOP regulars know that the whole ticket will be better off if the party unifies quickly behind Trump than if all the fissures of recent months are carried to Cleveland and televised to the nation. Especially since the most likely beneficiary may not be any better for the party. As one delegate is quoted as saying, “There’s just as many people that would question whether they could get behind Cruz.”
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on May 1, 2016 17:09:27 GMT -5
It appears that the GOP establishment is now resigned to Trump and thus a coronation of the Queen.
Polls in Indiana - even post Kasich - still show Cruz trailing Trump.
I do not care that Cruz cannot get along in D.C. - I do not care about likability.
I only seek a return to a Constitutional republic with an extremely small federal government as required under current law.
If you can eliminate the DOA, DOE, DOI, EPA and IRS in your term, then you are free to creep around the White House crawlspace during your down time.
I think likability has really hurt Cruz & helped Trump with delegates.
If you read political blogs & tweets - Trump is the more likable fellow.
I will not vote for Trump because of his radical leftist views & millions of others will not vote for him for other reasons.
I do agree, however, that the personality of Cruz has hurt him with voters not simply seeking the closest ideological fit available like myself...
Perhaps four years of the Hildabeast will empower a viable 3rd party in 2020.
>O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 1, 2016 20:42:01 GMT -5
It appears that the GOP establishment is now resigned to Trump and thus a coronation of the Queen.
From your mouth to god's ear! ;-)
Polls in Indiana - even post Kasich - still show Cruz trailing Trump.
Voters seldom share the calculations of political operatives, so the assumption that less campaigning by Kasich would move lots of his voters to Cruz never made much sense, especially with just days to go before the primary.
I do not care that Cruz cannot get along in D.C. - I do not care about likability.
I do not like green eggs and ham, I do not like them Sam-I-Am. The problem is not that Cruz has low "likeability" but rather that he has shown no capacity to work with others to achieve common goals. Essentially, his fellow Republicans here regard him as a back-stabbing self-promoter without an honest bone in his body. When he came to DC as a staffer he tried to move up the "Establishment" ladder, but his unprincipled ambition was too much even for this town. So, he went home to Texas, re-invented himself as an "outsider" (albeit one with degrees from Princeton and Harvard), bought a pickup and some plaid shirts, and started his presidential campaign by way of winning a Senate seat. He's been a pain in the butt to Republicans in Congress ever since. It's much worse than being unlikeable.
I only seek a return to a Constitutional republic with an extremely small federal government as required under current law.
I'm pretty sure you don't mean "under current law" because that's what you keep railing against. I suppose you mean "by my interpretation of the Constitution" there.
If you can eliminate the DOA, DOE, DOI, EPA and IRS in your term, then you are free to creep around the White House crawlspace during your down time.
DOA? Do you mean Ag? Well, in any case, none of these agencies is going anywhere. Agriculture provides important funding for food-related research, as well as marketing assistance to an industry that is among the US's biggest exporting sectors; fat chance we're going to undo that. DOE is more important than ever because, like it or not, the world is moving on to new energy sources, and either we're going to lead (and profit from) that or turn it over to China and Europe, paying them for new technologies instead of selling those technologies to them. Interior (I assume that's what you mean by DOI) manages millions of square miles of US-owned land; even if you closed the Department, the functions simply would move somewhere else. I would have thought that the Flint case would show anyone with a brain that we need more, not less, environmental protection; nobody wants his/her kids or grandkids getting poisoned by stuff dumped into our air, water, or soils, as happened for generations pre-EPA. And if you didn't have an IRS you'd have to invent it because whatever size government you have needs to be funded, and someone has to collect the taxes. This is why even Ronald Reagan couldn't close down agencies (except for the non-paid Tea Tasting Board): they actually do things that most Americans want done, or that simply need to be done to keep any government operating at all. Ted Cruz couldn't close them down if he were President, which he never will be.
I think likability has really hurt Cruz & helped Trump with delegates. If you read political blogs & tweets - Trump is the more likable fellow.
See above. Add in the obvious insincerity of his every utterance, and it's amazing he's lasted this long. Trump fakes sincerity much better, but then he has even fewer fixed beliefs than Cruz (a remarkable feat in itself) so it's easier for him.
I will not vote for Trump because of his radical leftist views & millions of others will not vote for him for other reasons.
Please urge all your friends to stay home, or at least skip the presidential line on the ballot. ;-)
I do agree, however, that the personality of Cruz has hurt him with voters not simply seeking the closest ideological fit available like myself...
Most voters aren't all that ideological. Some years ago Pew identified what it called "Big Government Conservatives"--mostly Republican voters who self-described as "conservative" but wanted bigger Social Security benefits, more extensive Medicare coverage, and other social benefits. These mostly are working- and lower-middle-class voters who have not shared in the wealth explosion among the investor class, and actually have seen their own incomes stagnate or fall. Look at exit polls and you'll find most of them voting for Trump this year.
Perhaps four years of the Hildabeast will empower a viable 3rd party in 2020.
Why do conservatives always have to turn to misogyny when dealing with Hillary? It's fundamentally childish. That said, there's not going to be a "viable third party" in 2020, or probably ever. The reason is pretty simple: Our institutional arrangements (one President, first-past-the-post congressional elections) both encourage the development of two broad-based parties, open to takeover by any popular movement that can muster enough support. Unlike in parliamentary systems, we don't have a practical way of sharing power among three or more parties through coalition governments after divided elections. Instead, our parties have to create those coalitions before elections, and that is much more likely to result in a two-party than a multi-party system. There's an extensive political science literature showing why this is so.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 2, 2016 13:53:06 GMT -5
Ted Cruz walked over to some Trump supporters at one of his rallies in Indiana today, and what ensued was one of his best moments as a candidate. He didn't change any minds, but he showed the kind of candidate he could have been by holding a rational conversation with a guy whose body language comes perilously close to incipient violence. I think 'basser will be proud of this one:
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on May 2, 2016 15:40:43 GMT -5
Is this the Trump voter in a nutshell?
I am embarrassed by both the intellect of the Indiana man & the now completely lost party that will soon nominate The Donald.
I have never once supported Trump & I will not be voting for him - I will vote down ticket.
Trump is a proven liberal & will govern from the left if elected - mark my words.
On misogyny - you should know that I criticize modern liberalism across all races, sexes & party lines.
Indeed, I often attack my own party to my detriment across a vast line of sexes, colors & creeds.
I am disappointed by your comment and I think you know better.
>O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 2, 2016 22:58:33 GMT -5
On misogyny - you should know that I criticize modern liberalism across all races, sexes & party lines.
Criticism is fine, name-calling not so much. No need for "Hildabeast" and I think you know that.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 3, 2016 19:36:11 GMT -5
Patrick Svitek: Just in: @tedcruz is ending his presidential campaign, campaign manager Jeff Roe tells me.
It's all over.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 5, 2016 0:54:18 GMT -5
This is how the last week began and ended for Ted Cruz; it comes with a warning: if you are a woman, do not stand near Ted at a speech:
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 10, 2016 15:08:02 GMT -5
You cannot make this up: "Ted Cruz floated the possibility of restarting his presidential campaign if he wins Nebraska's GOP primary on Tuesday and avoided saying whether he supports Donald Trump's bid for president. Cruz, who suspended his White House run last week, said he does not expect to win Nebraska's primary but is leaving the door open." linkHey, I guess I'll be rooting for Ted to pull this one out, lol. Pandemonium!
|
|
|
Post by buckybasser on Sept 23, 2016 20:15:56 GMT -5
Bump.
Cruz will now vote for Trump. No glowing endorsement...
Last week, Mark Levin said he will vote for Trump. No glowing endorsement...
I supported Cruz & listen to Levin as often as I can, but I am still not there yet...
The problems with Trump do not involve a wall or him not being PC - THEY ARE THAT HE IS A PROVEN BIG GOVERNMENT LIBERAL!!!
A signed pledge from Trump on Supreme Court Nominees that states "I will resign the day I nominate anyone not suggested by John C. Eastman" might just get my vote...
Until then, the first vote I will cast is for the moderately leftist Democrat - Senator Marco Rubio.
>O
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on Sept 23, 2016 20:53:41 GMT -5
Bump.
Cruz will now vote for Trump. No glowing endorsement...
Cruz has calculated that (a) Trump will lose in 2016, and (b) that will make him a (the?) leading candidate for 2020, so he can't afford to be castigated for failing to back the current nominee, even though Trump clearly is unfit to be President of the United States, or even Dogcatcher of Dogpatch, for that matter. With Cruz it's all calculation all the time, with not a principle to guide any of it.
|
|
|
Post by Dartaboswic on May 12, 2019 11:00:52 GMT -5
Если вы хотите испытать удачу в азартных играх онлайн, у вас есть задача сорвать огромный джекпот или у вас есть интерес просто отдохнуть, вы можете кликнуть на сайт online казино. Большое количество людей сегодня ведут игру в автоматы на живые деньги и <a href=https://avtomati-na-dengi.net/igrovie-avtomati>игровые автоматы</a> также если вас интересуют онлайн слоты с быстрым выводом активов, рекомендуем перейти на один из таких веб-сайтов. На avtomati-na-dengi.net вы сможете изучить правила игры, прочитать обзоры, где есть много интересных данных. Если у вас есть цель развиваться в индустрии онлайн игр, вам интересны разного рода игры, вы сможете найти что-то крутое на сайте именно для вас! Вам не надо вкладывать денежные средства, нет необходимости выбирать только одну игру. На портале вы можете изучить информацию о разных играх. Вас ожидают реально интересные сведения, которые доступны далеко не всем. Вы можете удваивать или утраивать бонусы. Прочитать справку о том, как это с умом делать – можно на портале. Невероятно много лиц, которые в 90х играли в casino в заведениях, сейчас ведут игру в online casino. На сайте вы можете ознакомиться с информацией о том, какие казино на деньги online славятся и в связи с чем. Если вы не можете определиться с списком игровых слотов на денежные средства и <a href=https://avtomati-na-dengi.net/hard-casino-fruits-n-stars>сорвать куш в игорный видео слот Fruits-n-Stars</a> , на сайте есть ряд обзоров, которые смогут вам посодействовать с выбором. Огромное количество разработчиков программного обеспечения, среди которых PlaySon, Aceking, Microgaming и другие, сейчас создают игровые автоматы, которые становятся популярными в сжатые сроки. Если вы хотите найти чисто информационно-обогревательный ресурс, вы можете зайти на avtomati-na-dengi.net, где вы можете прочитать справку о том, как мгновенно выводить активы. Если у вас в играх появляются трудности, вы не знаете что-то про слоты, сведения об этом вы также можете изучить на портале. Чтобы вы знали, игровой аппарат «Панда» обладает особой тематикой. А если говорить про Fairy Land, вы сможете повеселиться не на шутку. Ведь лягушки в Fairy Land могут дать шанс выиграть ряд призов. Вы можете также получить сведения о том, какие слоты позволят выиграть больше денег. Игровые автоматы сегодня очень популярны. В них можно играть с любых мобильных гаджетов, будь то ОС Android или iOS. Вы можете играть на порталах также на большие суммы. На данный момент в казино вашему вниманию предоставляются самые крутые и азартные слоты. Если вы давно хотели найти надёжную и честную онлайн-платформу, вас привлекают классические игровые аппараты, вы можете узнать подробности о них на сайте. Ныне есть достаточно многофункциональных слотов. Если у вас есть цель вести игру в многолинейные автоматы, вы можете делать это ныне прямо из браузера. В online играх развлекаются сейчас как парни, так и девушки. Необходимо подметить, что для того, чтобы вы могли положить на свой баланс активы, вам необходимо сделать перевод, используя одну из платежных систем: Qiwi, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги. Вы также можете узнать, работает ли сервис с банковскими картами Visa и MasterCard и сделать банковский перевод. В основном, все транзакции очень быстро доходят. После пополнения счета, вы сможете наслаждаться идеальной графикой и вести игру в слоты разного жанра. Одним из популярных слотов в наши дни есть Bratva. Этот слот завоевал доверие безумного количества ребят из разных государств СНГ. Стоит отдельно подчеркнуть, что игроки могут получать также разного рода бонусные предложения. Даже если в игре вам не удалось сорвать куш, вы сможете круто провести досуг и заработать крутой опыт. Вести игру в online casino лучше после регистрации. Это позволит обезопасить ваши данные и вашу игру. Необходимо выделить, что на avtomati-na-dengi.net вы можете просмотреть информацию о том, как правильно общаться с technical support. Часто бывают такие ситуации, когда менеджеры технической службы решают серьёзные вопросы, которые не могут решить пользователи самостоятельно. Если у вас проблемы с мультивалютной картой или вы не можете оформить вывод финансов, вам также надо писать в службу технической поддержки. Специалисты смогут разобраться в любых вопросах. На ресурсе вы сможете найти список вопросов, на которые администрация любого онлайн казино должна в сжатые сроки предоставлять обратную связь. Если у вас появляются сложности в игре в покер или рулетку, смело пишите в technical support и ожидайте ответ.
|
|
|
Post by Old Badger on May 12, 2019 16:18:23 GMT -5
Verrrrry interesting. ;-)
|
|
|
Post by Michlkal on Nov 19, 2020 5:16:59 GMT -5
Restoration of baths in Mytishchi <a href=https://megaremont.pro/ivanovo-restavratsiya-vann>https://megaremont.pro/ivanovo-restavratsiya-vann</a>
|
|